No, yeah… I think we’re on the same page, but the crucial part is that metamodernism inherits the multiperspectival appreciation that “all points of view are equally wrong” from postmodernism. It’s not metamodernism’s own “innovation.” What characterizes metamodernism to me, and distinguishes it from postmodernism, is its response to the potential quicksand that can be a paralyzing result of relativistic thinking. The oscillating between a full-on postmodern sensibility and a full-on modernist sensibility is one way out of that trap, and a way of characterizing metamodernism. In my work, I also observe several other “methods” that metamodern cultural artifacts employ, and even V&V, in their original essay, identify metamodern “strategies” identified by other thinkers, such as The Quirky (James MacDowell) and Performatism (Raoul Eshelman).